“The Death of SPIN” by Robert Wynne

08 Nov

If a tree falls in the forest, and no one hears it, it still makes a sound.  When a forest of screaming pundits crash into each other on TV (or online), everyone hears it.  But it doesn’t matter.

The cacophony of Liberal vs. Conservative, Democrat vs. Republican, has reached a boiling cauldron of over-caffeinated pollsters, pundits and publicists yelling at each other, dissipating into the atmosphere like wisps of steam.

As Wikipedia informs us, Spin is “a form of propaganda achieved through providing an interpretation of an event or campaign to persuade public opinion in favor or against a certain organization or public figure. While traditional public relations may also rely on creative presentation of the facts, ‘spin’ often, though not always, implies disingenuous, deceptive and/or highly manipulative tactics.”

In the 2012 presidential election, both sides reacted so quickly, and so enthusiastically, to each alleged tipping point, they canceled each other like Sumo wrestlers in a phone booth.  Think about it … how many “game changers” made a difference?

* The vice presidential selection

* The Republican Convention

* The Democratic Convention

* Governor Romney’s “47 percent” secretly taped video

* President Obama’s tepid performance in the Denver debate

* The vice presidential debate

* The (insert month here) unemployment report

* The (insert month here) growth report

* The second debate

* The third debate

* Hurricane Sandy

“The arguments were small,” said reporters at Politico. “Dozens of days were dominated by uproars over careless but inconsequential remarks by one candidate or another, with much of the debate playing out on cable TV and Twitter both of which shaped the contest in an unprecedented fashion.”

I agree with Politico that the arguments were indeed small, but I contradict that TV and Twitter shaped the contest at all.  They made no difference.  Audiences are used to both sides preparing for every issue with pundits, politicians and pollsters.  But people are rarely moved by “Gotcha”   Either the sides are too entrenched in their opinions or they completely discount the verbal food fights.

In his final electoral college prognostication, Nate Silver, the uncannily accurate statistician and pollster for the New York Times, predicted a victory for President Obama that was almost unchanged from the days before the first presidential debate in Denver.  If that polling result doesn’t prove the ineffectiveness of Spin, nothing will.

Spin is Dead.  It’s possible people change their minds or make decisions based on long-term trends, new facts or developments, the opinions of their family or friends, or any number of factors.  But the lesson of the 2012 presidential election is that short-term occurrences, buffeted by Spin, don’t matter very much.

That doesn’t mean we won’t hear it any more, I’m not naïve.  It just means the practice of relentlessly twisting any subject into a pretzel-shaped win for your side and a loss for the other team, has lost its impact.  Rest in Peace.  We could all use some quiet, civility, and conversations conducted at respectful volumes.

Robert Wynneis a public relations professional based in Manhattan Beach, Calif. He has consulted for large firms, start-ups and leading universities. He can be reached and also found Follow him at

1 Comment

Posted by on November 8, 2012 in Uncategorized


One response to ““The Death of SPIN” by Robert Wynne

  1. flapjack92

    November 12, 2012 at 3:35 pm

    I agree and disagree with Robert Wynn in this post. Near the beginning, his claim that both of the presidential candidates cancelled themselves out with all of the huge “game changers”, I have to agree with. There were so many of these game changers that really, after so many, they supposedly have this HUGE impact on voters according to the candidates, but they’ve lost their importance after 3 or 4 more game changers come along. On the other hand, I don’t agree with Wynn that spin is dead. I think that some people have become more weary about spin and are actually looking into what is being fed to them through the public medias. There are always going to be people out there that are skeptic of what the media tells them, and then there’s going to be the ones that hang on every word that is told to them because they fully believe the media can do no wrong, etc. etc..


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: