RSS

Fake Press Releases Article & the PRSA Response– Thoughts?

30 Nov

Fake press releases are a public service

By Jack Shafer
November 28, 2012

Yesterday, an enterprising clown used PRWeb to publish a fake press release about the purported purchasing of WiFi provider ICOA by Google for $400 million. The Associated Press, Business Insider, Forbes, TechCrunch and other websites ran stories about the transaction — without gaining confirmation from Google — and shortly after AllThingsD unmasked the release as fraudulent, the hoodwinked news organizations donned hair shirts in penance for their journalistic malpractice.

The pranked news organizations were right to self-flagellate, and the apologies and self-recriminations appeared to be sincere. “We were wrong on this post, for not following up with Google and the other company involved but posting rather than getting waiting [sic] on a solid confirmation beforehand from either source. We apologize to our readers,” confessed TechCrunch.

You don’t even have to be a talented liar to fool the press into publishing one of your lies. You just have to have gumption. In February, the Madison Capital Times got taken in by a phony press release about Representative Paul Ryan pressuring the Smithsonian to delete posters from its archives. A bogus April press release about the Bank of America’s seeking advice from customers on how to run its operation fooled the Dow Jones Newswire, and in June, a fake press release about General Mills got play in the Dow Jones Newswire, WSJ Online, and Fox Business News before the ruse was uncovered. In August, the Los Angeles Times got doubly duped when it ran a story about a nonexistent San Diego pharmacy crackdown that relied on two prank press releases.

The fake Google-ICOA press release may have been part of a “pump-and-dump” stock scheme, theorizes Technology Review, designed to boost the price of ICOA stock fivefold for a few hours, just enough time to reap quick profits. Thanks to the Web, it’s pretty simple to pollute the news stream with a counterfeit press release, as this PRWeb page on pricing indicates: You can send your release to “thousands of news outlets” for as little as $159 a release.

Did a pump-and-dumper really produce the Google-ICOA release? Surely such stock transactions would produce an incriminating paper trail and lead investigators back to the perpetrator, whom they could charge with stock manipulation. Could anybody be that stupid? I’m hoping the Google-ICOA release and others similar to it are minor acts of guerrilla press criticism by folks who have sufficient talent to mimic the press release template but insufficient talent or initiative to explain their low regard for the reporters covering the tech, political, business and crime beats. When a prank press release gets published, it identifies the outlets and journalists who were too lazy to make the single phone call that would have defused the joke. I consider that a real public service.

Or maybe I’m giving the prank press-release crowd too much credit. Perhaps their releases are an adult version of the “Do you have Prince Albert in a can?” phone calls that most of us made as kids.

Every prankster wants you to laugh, but some want you to laugh long enough to swallow their political point. The Yes Men excel at this technique: In 2011, they snookered the Associated Press with a release about GE repaying the government for a $3.8 billion tax break, and in 2010 they scored with a campaign against Chevron. In 2010, an unidentified person or group spoofed Koch Industries by distributing a release about climate change that was designed to look like it came from the company. (I don’t think any news organization bit.)

Theoretically, journalists should be the last people to fall for press releases, phony or otherwise. They’re lied to day-in and day-out on the phone by the people who write the genuine press releases I worry more about getting , and a good many of those genuine press releases aren’t exactly honest. I worry about counterfeit press releases, but I’m more suspicious about the real things, which claim to be true.

As much as some critics would like to blame the warp-speed of the Web for their mistakes, the reality is that such hoaxes and their victims have long been with us. Fake press releases are like the viruses that infect vulnerable computer systems; until you fix the system, they’ll continue to work.

******

If you must send press releases, send only fake ones to Shafer.Reuters@gmail.com. All of my Tweets are genuine. Sign up for email notifications of new Shafer columns (and other occasional announcements). Subscribe to this RSS feed for new Shafer columns.

November 28, 2012

PRSA Responds to Reuters Article Concerning Fake Press Releases

 PRSA today responded to an article by Reuters columnist Jack Shafer titled, “Fake press releases are a public service.”
In a comment posted to the article, PRSA’s Vice President of Public Relations, Arthur Yann, wrote:
Of course, the claim can be reliably made that journalists lie day-in and day-out to the audiences they serve, fabricating sources and quotes and making up information to fit the narrative they wish to tell.
My point simply is that liars and thieves exist in every profession, not just in public relations. And while the stereotype of public-relations-professional-as-liar is a reliable applause generator, any public relations professional who regularly misleads journalists (vs. a press-distributing bot) is not going to last long in this profession. And shouldn’t.
It’s the obligation of every public relations professional to serve the journalist community, which means helping them ferret out the facts and get their stories correct. The PRSA Code of Ethics (www.prsa.org/ethics) requires PRSA members and encourages all public relations professionals not only to “act promptly to correct erroneous communications for which the member is responsible,” but also to “investigate the truthfulness and accuracy of information released on behalf of those represented.”

Advertisements
 
7 Comments

Posted by on November 30, 2012 in Uncategorized

 

7 responses to “Fake Press Releases Article & the PRSA Response– Thoughts?

  1. meow484

    December 4, 2012 at 3:31 pm

    It shouldn’t be that easy for someone to pull that type of prank, professionals that are being sent New Releases should be fact checking and certainly checking the sources. They can only blame themselves for what they publish and distribute to the public because a majority of the public wants there opinions heard so they do what they can to make that happen. I’m not saying it’s right to do so but there some be standards of what is released to the public.
    This does give an example that other professions lie too, PR has a bad reputation for being the lairs but from just this one article it shows others lie and PR shouldn’t be stereotyped.

     
  2. bananas320

    December 6, 2012 at 6:06 pm

    I agree with the above poster. Professionals should be doing background and checking for the reliablility of sources rather than quickly printing to get the jump on having the latest greatest story. If I was in charge of a newspaper or establishment of the sort, I would rather be known as a credible sources of information rather than having the newest stories. Those are the principles that separate the newspapers from the tabloids. Although, I did think that the PRSA wrote a fine argument. They stood up for the profession rather than completely bending over and apologizing to avoid everyones butthurt. Yes, there are liars and theives EVERYWHERE. Stop picking on public relations!

     
  3. simmons1216

    December 10, 2012 at 10:35 pm

    You would think that professionals, to be called as such, would know to always be fact-checking and checking their sources. It really is their own faults that something like this happened. It’s unfortunate that people would be juvenile enough to make fake press release, but the “professionals” at the news publications should definitely have checked with the Google.

     
  4. baconftwlolz

    December 14, 2012 at 2:10 am

    Ya definitely should have had a stronger background check on that. Surprising that these news outlets allowed such a huge thing like this to slip past. Maybe it was a race to get a big story like that out? Regardless of the reasons clearly someone at the news outlet at some point said screw it lets get ratings and just ran with it. I mean there is something to be said for efficiency and you need to get the stories out as they happen but this was made out to be a several hundred million dollar sale of a company, you don’t just let that one slide.

     
  5. sony112

    December 14, 2012 at 10:03 am

    The PSRA did the right thing in speaking for the public relations side of the story, The attempt to ease the eye of attention from the negatives of Public relations is evident.

     
  6. safona

    December 16, 2012 at 1:43 am

    The professionals clearly dropped the ball on this one! Delivering news is a business. I understand that there may be pressure to always have the latest news before anyone else, but doesn’t it defeat that whole purpose if the ‘news’ that you’re getting isn’t actual news at all?!? It’s professional suicide! In time, and it won’t be long…they will not have an audience to lie to! They don’t deserve to have a voice, if they don’t want to take the time to check the facts!

     
  7. tex2524

    December 16, 2012 at 8:54 pm

    This “mistake,” this “slip,” whatever you may want to call it just blows my find. You would think the Associated Press for example wouldn’t run a story unless they were positive that the content of that story was relaible and true. I don’t understand how a mistake like this can happen to something as prominent as the Associated Press and to the other websites that were listed above. You’d think that they’d be aware of these potential “frauds” or fake news releases and they would just not run the story. It just seems careless to me, and it is indeed quite sad

     

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

 
%d bloggers like this: